Sunnyside Church of Christ

Difficult Cases

Home
Articles
Bible Study Tools
Debate Charts
PowerPoint Presentations On The Bible
Question/Answer
Contact Us
Directions
Calendar
Meet The Evangelist
Links
RULES FOR PERMISSION OF USE

"MDR: 3 Simple Points, Wait Game, Difficult Cases"
(Ron Halbrook)

 

[Question from a friend: If a couple divorces for something other than fornication, and some time down the road one party remarries. Does that constitute "fornication" and give the "other" party scriptural reason to remarry?]

[Answer to a friend:]

Good to hear from you. Thank you for your question.

Divine law on marriage may be stated in three simple points: A person may marry if never married before (as Adam and Eve, Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:4-5), if his mate is dead (Rom. 7:2-3), or if he put away his mate for fornication (Matt. 19:9). In short, God’s law of marriage says one man for one woman as long as the two live, the only exception being that an innocent party may put away a fornicator and marry another mate. This law of God applies to all mankind and to all cases.

When husband and wife walk off from each other, they sin by violating the marriage vows taken before God as primary witness and thus binding as long as they live (Mal. 2:14-16). Each one is responsible to reconcile or remain unmarried (1 Cor. 7:10-11). Each one is laying a stumbling block for the other by remaining apart and refusing to reconcile. If one remarries, the other mate who may be waiting and hoping for that to happen is guilty of CAUSING the adultery. Jesus said in Matt. 5:32 that whoever divorces his wife CAUSES her to commit adultery. Rather than being free to repudiate the mate already repudiated, the one who CAUSES another to sin is accountable to God for the sin of causing someone to sin (Matt. 18:1-6). This is the "waiting game" and "mental divorce."

I would add this word of caution. There are many difficult cases, tangled scenarios, etc., which none of us can solve to the satisfaction of everyone, and which can generate endless controversies if we allow ourselves to become obsessed with such questions. First, we should always emphasize the three simple points constituting God's law which apply to all people and all cases. Then, we may discuss our judgments and conclusions about difficult matters in a spirit of study and mutual respect, but we should avoid the spirit of factionalism over our judgments. The individual parties who may actually be involved in such difficult or complicated situations, and the local churches which may be called upon to deal with them, will have to settle them as best they can on a case by case basis. No one can enumerate all of these cases and settle the details for everyone.

I am forwarding several articles for further study on various aspects of MDR. You will notice my constant emphasis on the three simple points constituting God's law which apply to all people and all cases. That is where I keep my focus.

Sorry for the delay in answering. I am snowed under with work preparing to leave Mon. for a meeting in CA, then moderate for Larry Hafley in the debate with a Baptist the following week in CA, then return to the Philippines (hope to be home Apr. 30). Please keep me in your prayers.

May God bless you with many years to proclaim the gospel of Christ in its original purity and simplicity! May God bless and keep you til we meet again.

In Christian Love,

Ron Halbrook

"The Pillar And Ground Of The Truth"(1 Timothy 3:15)
1312 E. Edison Ave.,
Sunnyside, WA 98944